There are no ifs, ands, or buts about it. There is no ambiguity. There is a real necessity of crisis and the President must become a former occupant of the Oval Office as soon as possible.
I have been watching what President Trump has done and not done in his nearly-seven-month presidency with a mixture of anger, frustration, and disbelief. The only two things with which I have agreed are his saying immigrants should come here legally (but not as he has used it as a justification for banning Muslims) and backing out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Trump is no stranger to controversy -- look up the Central Park Five and his stance on it for just one example -- but now, as President, he seems to thrive on it.
From his dark and uninspiring "American carnage" inauguration speech and his childish argument about the size of the crowd in attendance to surrounding himself with ridiculous and uniformed representatives (i.e. Kellyanne "alternative facts" Conway, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump) and calling for a voter fraud investigation even though he won (likely because his ego just cannot stand not winning the popular vote in the 2016 election), he has shown his relish of inciteful rhetoric, his need of ego stroking, and his warm embrace of nepotism.
From his three decades-long business dealings with Russia and refusing to show his tax returns (clearly to hide something) to saying his failed business ventures (i.e. Trump Steaks, Trump Vodka, Trump Ice Spring Water) were actually successful, he shows shady and failed business dealings are okay. His firing of James Comey as FBI Director when Comey was giving Trump himself more scrutiny, as well as his still-in-play potential move to remove Special Counsel Robert Mueller from his investigation, and publicly lambasting Attorney General Jeff Sessions for recusing himself from the Russian investigation, reveals a person who has very serious matters to hide. (Not to mention how in the world he thought none of this would ever come out once he got into the White House is mind-boggling.) His regular use of language to put down others in order to make himself look better (i.e. "failing New York Times", "sleepy eyes Chuck Todd", "crooked Hillary", "fake news", "Psycho Joe" Scarborough, etc.) clearly displays a character flaw.
It's as though his promise to do things in Washington far differently than the status quo really stood for just starting up a bulldozer and letting it run without a driver. That is not implementation of new, untried methods of governance, but rather a collateral damage presidency.
Don't even get me started on how ignorant Trump and his staffers and supporters are regarding history, not to mention his own inexplicable admiration for Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin. And when has any U.S. President stated publicly that ruthless leaders like Putin are great leaders?
Still, Republican members of Congress along with various Trump supporters had only gone so far as to say, well, they might not do the same thing or, okay, what Trump said was inappropriate before jumping off the subject.
Let us now look at this past Saturday in the town of Charlottesville, Virginia.
The above picture is of a vehicular assault on a crowd of anti-Nazi/anti-white supremacist protesters. The protesters were there in response to a march of White Supremacists protesting the removal of a statue of Confederacy General Robert E. Lee and the renaming of Lee Park, where the statue is located, to Emancipation Park. James Alex Fields, Jr., plowed into the crowd, rear-ending two vehicles, injuring nineteen persons and killing one, 32-year-old Heather Heyer. Fields was seen, earlier in the day, marching with the white supremacists.
Led by Jason Kessler, founder of the far-right group Unity & Security for America, white supremacists attending the 'Unite the Right' rally came armed. They had firearms and other items that could be used as weapons. Their claim for doing so is that they knew there would be a confrontation with those who disagree with them. My opinion is that they came armed, not because they simply knew a confrontation was coming, but that they wanted a confrontation to take place. When you espouse violence and use images of people fighting you to bolster your position, how could you reject such a desire?
The anti-white supremacist protesters came to counter the Unite the Right rally's message. They disagree with having statues that honor those who fought for division and for slavery. I agree. I do not agree with destroying them or hiding them, however. They belong in museums, not out in the open. Those statues, as well as the Confederate flag, are not representing heritage. They represent a collective mind of people who believed in maintaining the slavery state and who were willing to tear apart the country to do so.
Pro-Nazism and pro-Confederacy movements are making strange bedfellows these days. Although, David Duke, a member of the American Nazi Party, who joined the KKK in 1967, eventually becoming its Grand Wizard, began pulling the two movements closer decades ago. The two movements have a similarity that can be described as white supremacy or a pro-white mentality merger. Slave owners were primarily white and, since black persons were nothing more than chattel, a whites-only dominion was the norm of the day. Nazism, which, in addition to Jews, also fought against groups like Catholics and black people, believed certain white persons (the Aryan race) were the "Master Race" intended to take over and run the Earth. Like the Confederacy's willingness to tear the United States apart to achieve its goals, the Nazis were willing to tear the world apart to achieve theirs. Every President, from Franklin Roosevelt to Barack Obama, has openly and freely condemned the Nazi movement and all of its offshoots.
Every president, that is, except President Donald Trump.
Now, before anyone argues that he did come out and condemn various hate groups by name on Monday, it is important to look at all three mentions President Trump has made regarding this issue in the past several days, not just the one he made on Monday.
Saturday was the day of the march, the anti-protest march, physical attacks, and the murder of someone plus the injuring of more than a dozen individuals. Later that day, Trump claimed hatred, bigotry, and violence came from "many sides". No specific mention of the groups responsible, but just three words, "on many sides", ended up spreading the blame like a pat of ambiguous butter across an entire loaf of bread. It was a Nazi / white supremacist rally that invoked violence, which means it should have been rebuked by name. Nazism, white supremacy, and all of its hoards of hatred must be denounced, by name, with strong terms ... and it should come easily. Trump, who consistently slammed Hillary Clinton during the presidential campaign for not saying specifically "radical Islamic terrorists" did not do the same on Saturday regarding white supremacists.
On Monday, President Trump was much more specific:
"Racism is evil and those who commit violence in its name are criminals and
thugs, including the KKK, Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists, and other hate
groups that are repugnant to every we hold dear as Americans."
Clearly, much better.
The kicker came two days ago during a press conference originally slated to discuss infrastructure, which quickly turned to the events in Charlottesville. First, the President said he did not wait to be more specific on Saturday in his condemnation of the violence because he "wanted all the facts", which apparently took forty-eight hours to accomplish. (He added that he likes to be correct when he makes a statement. Liking to and doing are two different things.) He refused to call the car attack terrorism, calling it "the fastest one to come up with a good verdict", whatever that was supposed to mean. He claimed that not all those who marched with the Unite the Right rally were white supremacists, even adding that the evening protest the night before.was quiet. He even said that, if statues of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson were coming down, why not statues of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, drawing a glaring false equivalency. Some of those who took part in the Unite the Right rally were "very fine people", according to the President, and he also reiterated that blame rests on both sides.
So, if you're speaking in broad terms on Saturday, then speak in specific terms on Monday, and then speak in broad terms once again on Tuesday, how do Americans find solace in a President righteously condemning evil? The answer is they don't because he really doesn't.
The following short documentary put out by Vice News, which begins with images from the "quiet" evening rally the night before, recounts what happened in Charlottesville on Saturday. Warning: Graphic images and language.
© 2017 Vice News / Home Box Office
In 1943, during World War II, the U.S. government put out an anti-fascist educational film titled Don't Be a Sucker. (It was re-released in 1947.) An abridged version has been making the rounds on social media. Below is the full film, which runs about seventeen minutes. Watch it and see if you see any relevance to what is going on today.
What about all this uprising of white supremacists, fascists, and racists? New? Hardly. However, like any forest during a lengthy dry spell, just one spark can bring about a forest fire. These hateful, evil people are the forest, but what was the spark?
Mr. Trump, when you said in your inauguration speech that your inauguration would be "remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again", to which people exactly were you referring?
Congress has the power to serve him his walking papers, but will they? If they have only mildly condemned the President on things he has said during the campaign and while in the White House, what will happen in the light of this? Do enough members of Congress have to be attacked personally (i.e. death, dismemberment, harm to their families) before they do something? If the President refuses to condemn, by name, this evil and not waver in that condemnation -- and not coming across as though he'sbeing forced to do so -- how is he functioning in the best interests of the nation? And how is that wavering not un-American? In embracing Vladimir Putin and only condemning white supremacists when pushed to do so, how can you leave him in power? The House already voted earlier this year to not proceed in forcing Trump to disclose his tax returns, so, when all the nasty information from them comes out, they are co-conspirators. If Nazism, white supremacy, and racism are allowed to rule the day, you are not our Congress, rather our complicit oppressors.
I almost forgot to mention three key players in the midst of this who should also go ASAP. First, Steve Bannon, the White House Chief Strategist, who used to head the alt-right website Breitbart.com before his appointment by Trump. Next, Stephen Miller, a Trump senior adviser, was once mentored by Jason Kessler, the white nationalist who organized the Unite the Right rally on Saturday. Finally, Sebastian Gorka, Deputy Assistant to Donald Trump, who also worked for Breitbart, is connected to Vitézi Rend, a Hungarian anti-Semitic nationalist group. (He even wore a pin of Vitézi Rend's logo on his lapel to the inauguration.)
Just yesterday, one of the cable news shows displayed this on the bottom of the screen: GOP SPLIT ON TRUMP RESPONSE TO WHITE SUPREMACISTS Are they serious?! Split??!!! On that???!!!!!! I guess loyalty to country is conditional, and I would love to hear an explanation on how that split isn't un-American.
Congress of the United States, you need to get a backbone, remember it is the country you serve, not simply the President, and act on this swiftly. Mr. Trump is the President of America, but, in addition to every terrible thing else, he is un-American. That makes his removal not merely a possibility, but an absolute necessity.
Terry
No comments:
Post a Comment